Saturday, May 31, 2014

this mass mailer from Tesoro savages PR flacks just landed in my mailbox

I have nothing to say about this particular piece of drivel junk mail, except to note that the final decision on Tesoro savages oil by rail terminal does not rest in the hands of Vancouver City Council, as noted in prior posts on this topic.

Rather, the final decision on whether we have oil by rail is actually in the hands of Governor Inslee and his staff, who are likely, as insiders in Olympia indicate, to veto the oil by rail terminal.

hence I am not sure why Tesoro and the Port of Vancouver are spending so much money on this simply bark up the wrong tree. it annoys me, as well as 90% of my neighbors, to be getting this trash in our mailbox.

giving waste management and Don Benton spent 55 thousand dollars to promote his accomplishments as director of environmental services at County, I assume the oil people spent the same.

just to be sure, I will check with the public disclosure condition in Olympia to find out. Also I want to see too who is donating money to "people for tesoro", the name of this particular citizens group.

I am CC'ing the Vancouver City Council on this post 200 them to stand strong and vote no on oil by rail. I also urge tesoro to calm down.

Friday, May 30, 2014

Fwd: RE: Overgrown W Mill Plain Blvd medians

the below is an excellent response from Clark Countys vegetation management director. apparently control of blackberries on West mill plain Boulevard is the city's responsibility.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Tyler, Kevin" <Kevin.Tyler@clark.wa.gov>
Date: May 30, 2014 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: Overgrown W Mill Plain Blvd medians
To: "Shea Michael Anderson" <sheaside@gmail.com>
Cc: "Holmes, Eric" <Eric.Holmes@cityofvancouver.us>, "Radcliff, Keith" <Keith.Radcliff@clark.wa.gov>

Hello,

 

Thank you for the e-mail. The medians along Mill Plain would be the City of Vancouver's responsibility, as far as I know. Here at Vegetation Management we are responsible for the county's noxious weed control program. Unfortunately, blackberries are listed by the State of Washington as a Class C weed and are not designated for control in Clark County, or anywhere in the State of Washington for that matter. So, we have no authority to require that property owners control this particular weed. Our inspectors do survey City of Vancouver rights-of-way and have been in close contact with city personnel that are responsible for noxious weed control. I'm personally not aware of any noxious weeds along Mill Plain in this area that are both listed by the state as either Class A or Class B, and designated for control in Clark County. However, I have copied our Field Inspector responsible for the Vancouver city limits to see if he has any additional information for us.

 

Sincerely,

 

Kevin Tyler

Resource Enhancement & Permitting Manager
Clark County Environmental Services
CASEE Center (360) 397-6140 x7731

Public Service Center (360) 397-2121 x4258
Cell (360) 773-7674

 

From: Shea Michael Anderson [mailto:sheaside@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:27 AM
To: sheaside.imonik@blogger.com
Cc: Holmes, Eric; Tyler, Kevin
Subject: Overgrown W Mill Plain Blvd medians

 

PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING EMAIL CONSTITUTES A PUBLIC BLOG AT OVANCOUVRIA.BLOGSPOT.COM. YOU ARE BEING EMAILED IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SUBJECT CONTAINED THEREIN. THANK YOU.

I'm writing a short Friday blog post in order to query City Manager Holmes and Clark County Vegetation Management Director Kevin Tyler as to WHY nothing has been done to rid W Mill Plain Blvd medians of noxious vegetation - blackberries, in particular, have overgrown the sidewalks on W Mill Plain between Harney and Franklin - where I walk just about every day.

You'd think County staff could see said vegetation overgrowth from their windows, as well as the adjacent shelter it provides for activities ranging from sleeping to drug use to Lord knows what - also in evidence along W Mill Plain. I'm not sure if the keeping up with noxious vegetation on W Mill Plain is a County or City problem - hence I'm cc'ing both on this post in the hopes of getting something done, and quick.



--

  --   This e-mail and related attachments and any response may be subject to public disclosure under state law.

Overgrown W Mill Plain Blvd medians

PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING EMAIL CONSTITUTES A PUBLIC BLOG AT OVANCOUVRIA.BLOGSPOT.COM. YOU ARE BEING EMAILED IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SUBJECT CONTAINED THEREIN. THANK YOU.

I'm writing a short Friday blog post in order to query City Manager Holmes and Clark County Vegetation Management Director Kevin Tyler as to WHY nothing has been done to rid W Mill Plain Blvd medians of noxious vegetation - blackberries, in particular, have overgrown the sidewalks on W Mill Plain between Harney and Franklin - where I walk just about every day.

You'd think County staff could see said vegetation overgrowth from their windows, as well as the adjacent shelter it provides for activities ranging from sleeping to drug use to Lord knows what - also in evidence along W Mill Plain. I'm not sure if the keeping up with noxious vegetation on W Mill Plain is a County or City problem - hence I'm cc'ing both on this post in the hopes of getting something done, and quick.



--
Shea Michael Anderson
1923 Harney St, Vancouver WA 98660

Saturday, May 24, 2014

crosswalk correction

I stand corrected lol. There is a semi marked crosswalk at John Ball Park. it could probably use a speed bump and some of those reflective lights perhaps.

Friday, May 23, 2014

Harney Street Speedway

In a short post this evening, I sit on my porch looking out at Harney Street & wonder why it is there are no stop signs on our street between 19th and fourth plain. a total of 7 blocks. let alone marked crosswalks or speed bumps.

I am sure that other streets in Vancouver are suffering a similar plight. the trouble I have with the lack of stop signs on my street is that many, myself sometimes included, tend to go way faster than 25... there are no obstacles to slow folks down.

I have heard that the city refuses to put 3 Way stops in, and will only install stop signs at four way intersections. my street does not have a four way intersection on seven blocks indicated. so does this mean no stop sign anywhere?

Harney runs next to John Ball Park, and there are lots of kids living on the street. I can't believe the city does not find it necessary to at least put in a marked crosswalk at the park. let alone a couple speed bumps like the ones on Franklin, or gasp, a three way stop... maybe near the park?

I have asked the citys transportation department before about getting stop signs put in when I used to live on 17th at Markle. I filled out their little form online, no response.

I understand that the lack of slow down obstacles on my street is an ongoing problem. I am not yet going to bring this to the attention of our city manager, but I am going to be a bit more vocal about this. folks on our street deserve to be safe.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Port and City Make Nice Over Vancouver's "New Pearl"

I'm pleased to report that any rumors of disagreement between the Port and the City of Vancouver over access and road connections through Terminal One (where Red Lion At The Quay is located, off Columbia Street) to the City's sparkling new waterfront development are now moot. 

Sources "in the know" regarding the ongoing saga of the Port of Vancouver's desire to have Tesoro/Savage ship "oil by rail" from a yet-to-be-built terminal and refinery had indicated that the Port, piqued over City Council's opposition to said terminal, had blocked access to the new waterfront development site through Red Lion At The Quay, along with prohibiting construction of any connector roads and the like through to Columbia Street. 

Hence, the long delay of (now) over six months since any construction has taken place at the waterfront site - leading to the odd spectacle of gorgeous new underpass roads at Esther & Grant Streets (complete with artsy lighting, brick pavers, landscaping, and benches) ending in construction orange barricades. To boot, access to the undeveloped site has been (and is still) completely open - meaning numerous of Vantucky's homeless folks have been using the site as a place to camp out at night and rest during the day - all fine and well until you consider the cleanup the City has to do, the policing of the area that doesn't seem to be done, and the liabilities of allowing folks full access to a construction site (including riverfront). 

It seemed strange to me, walking by there the other day, that the City would allow all this to go on within full view of our shiny new City Hall building. Hence, my query to Councilmember Anne McEnerny-Ogle, as well as City Manager Holmes and officials at the Port. As upset as the Port may be over the City's opposition to their oil terminal, it seemed ridiculous that their anger would lead to the City's all but abandoning the site to transients over the winter. Likewise, the City, by not at least making the area some sort of "parklike" space (i.e., grass, maybe a doggie fenced park area, gravel culdesacs at Esther & Grant, good lighting), seemed to be basically pouting over the Port's refusal to allow connections through Red Lion. Finally, there's also the pique of the developer to consider - as The Columbian noted a while back, the waterfront site developers have threatened to pull out if said oil terminal is built. 

Regardless of the oil terminal's construction (which likely won't happen, according to several Olympia and local sources), it seems that the Port, the City, and the developer are all best of friends again according to McEnerny-Ogle. In her quick and thorough response to me she noted that things were "moving forward" to finish the needed infrastructure at the waterfront site (the City's agreement with developers was to put in said infrastructure before building commenced) and that permits would be issued following a final Council vote on the finished site plan at their June meeting. Said happy amity cannot come a moment too soon, methinks. 

In the meantime, I still wonder why on earth the City would think it a GOOD IDEA to allow complete 24/7 unpoliced access to what is basically a construction zone, without thinking it worthy to spend 20K or so on some gravel and grass seed, as well as a temporary fence along the dangerous river embankment. Maybe even pick up some construction debris. I can understand the City not wanting to spend money on what might not be a "sure thing" (if the developer pulled out over the oil terminal construction). But c'mon, how much is grass seed these days? I can get a 20 lb bag, enough for around 4K sq feet, for about $15 at the Jantzen Beach Home Depot. 

I also wonder why on earth the Port chose (if in fact they did, the Port didn't respond to my emails, and Councilmember McEnerny-Ogle sidestepped any question of disagreement) to block access to the site in order to express their displeasure at the City's oil by rail opposition. Seems to me the Port could better spend their lobbying efforts and political clout in Olympia at Governor Inslee's office (since he has the final say on said terminal), giving folks up there alot more carrots and alot less sticks. 

Ah well. Seems alls well that ends well, and everyone has kissed and made up. Which makes me happy...we'll see if this romantic reunion continues. 

Friday, May 16, 2014

Carolyn Crain Has All The Hot Spots

Quick comment on the gigantic Carolyn Crain signs sprouting up all over town - while her supporters enthusiasm, as seen in the HUGE size of her signs, her locations and placement seem, well, flaky - not sure if thats a reflection on Crain's "unorthodox" style.

Anyways, said signs can best be viewed at:

-Columbia + W 21st St - on entire upper half of red house.

-W 15th St + Washington - half hidden by trees on empty lot, w/construction rigs parked next to it.

-Van Plaza Dr @ Target, w/sign facing IN from SR 500...sure to get freeway drivers' attention. Picture included, note sign in far middle background.

One hopes Crain's backers, who include "Daddy Warbucks" Madore, will inject her campaign with slush funds enough to override the good government we in W Vanc have enjoyed under Jim Moeller. Altho I have my doubts...

Waterfront development post delayed til Monday. Thanks.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Spring Break


>
> For those few wondering (and possibly sighing in relief), I decided a few weeks back to take a break from posting to O Vancouvria!. Between the unfortunate "he said she said" business over Jim Moeller's Tesoro stance, my "day job" doing landscape renovations and teaching gardening classes, and me breaking my head against continued walls of Vantucky-and-adjacent local government (weak City Council, rude and unresponsive bureaucrats, and the M+M oligarchy), it became clear local politics and local change was the main cause of my blood boiling.
>
> So, a breather. And a re-think.
>
> Here's where a rested blogger and professionally trained anthropologist is at:
>
> No more five-six times daily posts whenever a notion political pops in my head. I'll get an aneurysm, you'll find me a headache, and nothing changes.
>
> No more following up publicly on tips "of the moment" - Tesoro, the Interstate Bridge mess, waterfront hoo-ha, M+M's dastardly deeds, the idiotic bumblings of "our man in Olympia", and (lastly) the as-yet-unapproved by Council (who cant deny commercial development on lots zoned commercial anyways) Uptown McDonald's. Yeah, I gots positions on the shiznit. No, I dont care to tilt at windmills. Yeah, I know for a fact these issues are Don Quixote worthy.
>
> No more railing against our powerless City Council and lack of citizen oversight and true accountability in our weak-mayor Vantucky government-including not trying to force change at the ballot box. Eric Holmes is a good city manager-and makes (for now) our half-assed style of city government a non issue - thanks to STRONG neighborhood groups and non governmental orgs. I assume I'll scream with everyone else when and if Council hires, say, a David Madore-like city manager. But not now.
>
> Instead of bemoaning, I plan on critical oversight and investigating-fieldwork that gets the actual lay of the ground - not just the gloss or the muck. Praise where merited, scorn where deserved - and constructive critique with actual possible solutions to our messes. My post on goings on with a plastic bag ban, for instance.
>
> I plan on creeping along carefully and laying low to this ground, keeping an ear out for the devil in our details. I have no aspirations to be anyone's mouthpiece nor a desire for political office - I'm unelectable anyways. For reals.
>
> Stay tuned. I'll say what needs to be said, and cast a light on what others sweep under rugs here. Have no doubt.
>
> Next post (Friday): efforts by City Council to regulate plastic bags. Looks like Anne McEnerny-Ogle's maybe got a quorum on a possible ban with some savvy groundwork.